Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nolan Yuma's avatar

I haven’t seen or read the Dr. Strangelove script since 2011, so I won’t challenge the plot points. The first thing that jumped out at me when I saw Yorke’s 3-D Roadmap of Change was how could this apply to tragedy or stories with a theme where humans are doomed to repeat their mistakes? Adding the moral and consequence cleared that up for me.

What I like about Yorke’s 3-D Roadmap of Change is that it helps to create character arcs and it can fit into other structures (Spiral structure, Wheel structure, Episodic structure with an arc, etc.) But it still seems formulaic and whereas it might work for many Hollywood movies, it might not work for all literature. However, I haven’t seriously tried to fit it into an epic novel. Have you?

I love thinking about structure, but the best piece of advice I ever read about structure was “use reveals and get 3 act structure out of your head.” Someone wrote a book about it, but I can’t remember who, nor could I find the book I was looking for. But what it came down to is that thinking about reveals (plot reveals, character-specific revelations, other characters discover previous plot reveals, etc.,) frees up the writer and results in plots that aren’t formulaic, but still intriguing. I’m curious to know your thoughts and if you can think of specific plot points as reveals with Dr. Strangelove?

Another thing I always look for is if the internal, external, and thematic questions all get answered in one scene during the climax. Do you think this happens during Total mastery? Major Kong manages to open the damaged doors and rides the bomb in this iconic scene. Or during the Consquence? “The Doomsday device goes off, followed by a multitude of nuclear explosions to the iconic WWII song “We’ll Meet Again” by Vera Lynn (1943)” does this.

And how important is it to have the internal, external, and thematic questions all answered in one scene during the climax?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts